Pretty Lame Explanation for Bakken Oil

What's New?

Solar And You

The Environment

Kids' Stuff

$Math Help: Basic$

$Math Games$

Vehicles

Some Theory

Site Stuff

Buy & Invest

[?] Subscribe To This Site

Pretty Lame Explanation for Bakken Oil

by Keith Patton
(Katy, Texas)

I've been a petroleum geologist for 29 years and the explanation above is the lamest I have seen in a long while. Your figures of "continuous" versus "discrete" oil deposits differ only in spacial distribution and are false and misleading.

If your description was anywhere near accurate it would negate the one thing that has any hope of making the Trend economically productive: Horizontal Drilling. While the trend may be discontinuous, the pay is distributed in large continuous thin bodies that make its exploitation ideal for horizontal drilling as opposed to vertical wells. One horizontal well can drain a vast area whereas it would take tens of wells to do the same with vertical drilled wells.

Of course you do not mention that. Instead you trot out the same old false logic that this play or that play will only supply X number of years or months of production if it is drilled and exploited. The same arguments made back in the early 70's about Prudoe Bay and oh wait, that field has been producing now for almost 40 years!

You quacks make arguments based on angstrom thin understanding of an industry and technology that you profess to hate because it stands for everything you aren't. The oil industry has been an example of optimism, entrepenurship and progressive ideas since its inception at the turn of the century.

All I can remember the green revolution doing for me was giving me an excuse to skip some classes on Earthday. It has ever and always been about obstructionism.

Comments for
Pretty Lame Explanation for Bakken Oil

Average Rating

Click here to add your own comments

Dec 03, 2009
Rating

If what you say is true
by: Ray

Keith, Sounds like (if what you say is true) the only thing in the way of extracting this oil is to drill baby drill. Of coarse our government knows better then those in the business and will feed us a bunch of bologna only to advance their agenda of bankrupting America to bring in their Socialistic agenda. I say if the oil is there we need to vote in those that want to return America back to what She was founded upon, United as one Nation Under GOD. We need to get rid of the environmentalist, the Green people and the global warmers, etc. and start putting America back on Her feet and climb to the top, because we have slipped down a few notches almost to the point of not being number One in the world. I say lets stand up and DRILL! Forty years out of this well in Bakken would be great! Good start huh? Thanks for your knowledge Keith,

Nov 05, 2009
Rating

NEA
by: Anonymous

This is a typical response from an uneducated of thr teaching profession. You don't seem to have respect for real science only hearsay without documentation. You should be or are a government employee in DC.

Nov 04, 2009
Rating

I'm no Geologist
by: Roger (admin)

You are correct in that I am not a geologist and since you profess to be, I have to respect your knowledge in these areas.

In my defense, I have suggested horizontal drilling as a way of overcoming the continuous nature of the Bakken Oil field and I am certain that as soon as such methods become profitable they will be employed to provide the US or whoever owns the drilling rights to the full measure of the wealth potential in that area.

I am a school teacher and as such my specialty is making difficult concepts easy to understand. This was the purpose of the Bakken Oil article on my website, and I used data provided by the USGS for this purpose.

As for being a far left "reds under the bed" greenie, I claim no such title (I love that term). I am interested in the facts and the facts alone. Can the Bakken Oil Field help the US to achieve energy independence and so hopefully eventually move to cleaner and more renewable energy sources? I sure hope so even though I am not a US resident. Where the US goes, the world follows. In Australia this is certainly the case.

I understand the role that the so-called "fossil fuel" industry has played in the development of first world nations; if you are in any doubt of this you can have a look at the "benefits of fossil fuels" article I have on this same website, here:

http://www.green-planet-solar-energy.com/advantages-of-fossil-fuels.html

I welcome frank and open discussion of the facts and I try (sometimes more successfully than others!) to keep an open mind on ALL issues. What I think is clear though is that at some stage in the near future, for whatever reason, we will have to move beyond a dependence on oil , coal and natural gas. In my opinion the ways to do that are through solar power and wind power. These are resources that will never disappear, at least not while our species is on this planet. I may be wrong but that is a risk we all face.

Please feel free to expand on your comments in your original post and if you are able to provide verifiable information as to where my description of the situation is wrong, I will happily modify my article.

Thanks for your contribution, and I look forward to hearing from you and all other readers of this article.

X Close Editor

Nov 04, 2009
Rating

Submitted by: Roger (admin)

Title

Comment
You are correct in that I am not a geologist and since you profess to be, I have to respect your knowledge in these areas. In my defense, I have suggested horizontal drilling as a way of overcoming the continuous nature of the Bakken Oil field and I am certain that as soon as such methods become profitable they will be employed to provide the US or whoever owns the drilling rights to the full measure of the wealth potential in that area. I am a school teacher and as such my specialty is making difficult concepts easy to understand. This was the purpose of the Bakken Oil article on my website, and I used data provided by the USGS for this purpose. As for being a far left "reds under the bed" greenie, I claim no such title (I love that term). I am interested in the facts and the facts alone. Can the Bakken Oil Field help the US to achieve energy independence and so hopefully eventually move to cleaner and more renewable energy sources? I sure hope so even though I am not a US resident. Where the US goes, the world follows. In Australia this is certainly the case. I understand the role that the so-called "fossil fuel" industry has played in the development of first world nations; if you are in any doubt of this you can have a look at the "benefits of fossil fuels" article I have on this same website, here: http://www.green-planet-solar-energy.com/advantages-of-fossil-fuels.html I welcome frank and open discussion of the facts and I try (sometimes more successfully than others!) to keep an open mind on ALL issues. What I think is clear though is that at some stage in the near future, for whatever reason, we will have to move beyond a dependence on oil , coal and natural gas. In my opinion the ways to do that are through solar power and wind power. These are resources that will never disappear, at least not while our species is on this planet. I may be wrong but that is a risk we all face. Please feel free to expand on your comments in your original post and if you are able to provide verifiable information as to where my description of the situation is wrong, I will happily modify my article. Thanks for your contribution, and I look forward to hearing from you and all other readers of this article.

Cancel Delete Delete & Ban

throbber Updating Comments page...

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Bakken Oil

Pretty Lame Explanation for Bakken Oil

Comments for Pretty Lame Explanation for Bakken Oil

Comments for
Pretty Lame Explanation for Bakken Oil